ArticleScientific reports2026
Reinforcement learning framework for computerized adaptive testing using multi armed bandit approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research introduces a new framework based on the combination of deep learning and reinforcement learning techniques for computer-based adaptive testing that overcomes the limitations of traditional methods for test preparation. By effectively modeling the test taker’s response patterns and utilizing mathematical modeling techniques, our approach attempts to demonstrate optimal performance in estimating the test taker’s abilities and designing the test according to his abilities. Our proposed method is carried out in three main stages. In the first stage, a one-dimensional deep neural network is used to estimate the test taker’s ability level, which is performed periodically. In the second stage, a model based on the multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem is used to select the test strategy. In the mathematical model, the objectives are to consider the goals of content coverage and matching the test taker’s level. At the third stage, the updating of parameters and repetition of the test strategy determination operation is done through a reinforcement learning model. Through these integrated steps, our proposed method provides an effective approach to adaptive testing that is closely aligned with individual capabilities. The experimental results showed that our proposed method outperformed the comparative methods and achieved Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) values of 1.53 and 1.21, which are significant compared to other methods. These results confirm the effectiveness and superiority of our approach in estimating abilities and designing tests that are tailored to the individual capabilities of respondents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.