ArticleScientific reports2026
Potential of jute seeds crop waste for textile applications: a novel machine-based approach for sustainable resource utilization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seed-producing jute plants are commonly harvested solely for their seeds, leaving the fibre-rich stems unutilized and often burned, which contributes to environmental pollution and resource loss. This study explores the valorization of these stems by extracting fibres suitable for textile applications while maintaining seed yield. A novel Circular Scissor machine was designed and fabricated to separate seed-bearing branches from fibre-rich stems with an operational efficiency of 65–100% and minimal seed damage. The separated stems were processed using two retting methods: biological (water) retting and a mixed biological–chemical retting process employing 5% urea. A side-by-side comparison showed that the urea-assisted process reduced the total retting time (from 33 to 29 days) and produced finer fibres (2.90 tex vs. 3.27 tex for water-retted samples), with improved surface cleanliness and better strand separation, as confirmed by SEM and FTIR analyses. Both methods yielded fibres that met Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) grading standards for coarse textile applications such as rugs, mats, and upholstery. This combined approach preserving seeds while recovering fibre reduces open-field burning, enhances farmers’ income streams, and demonstrates the potential of jute seed crop stems as a sustainable textile fibre resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.