ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid learning framework for automated multiclass electrocardiogram classification with SimCardioNet.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early prediction of sepsis in the ICU: a comparative analysis of multiple machine-learning algorithms using the MIMIC-III database.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrocardiography is a cornerstone in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases; however, accurate interpretation demands expert knowledge and is often impeded by data scarcity and annotation costs. To address these challenges, we propose SimCardioNet, a hybrid self-supervised and supervised deep learning framework for multi-class electrocardiography image classification. SimCardioNet leverages a custom multi-scale convolutional neural network backbone enhanced with residual connections and multi-head self-attention, pretrained via a modified SimCLR contrastive learning strategy that integrates a hybrid loss combining InfoNCE and cosine similarity. Following self-supervised pretraining, the model undergoes supervised fine-tuning with progressive layer unfreezing to mitigate overfitting and preserve meaningful representations. We evaluate SimCardioNet across three distinct ECG image datasets: (1) a 4-class Pakistani clinical ECG dataset (Dataset I), (2) an external Kaggle electrocardiography dataset for out-of-distribution validation (Dataset II), and (3) the large-scale PTB-XL benchmark (Dataset III) covering five diagnostic superclasses. On Dataset I, SimCardioNet achieves 0.975 accuracy, 0.973 precision, 0.973 recall, and 0.972 F1-score under 3-fold cross-validation. On Dataset II, the model demonstrates perfect classification performance (1.00 accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score), highlighting strong generalization. On the PTB-XL dataset (Dataset III), SimCardioNet attains 0.921 accuracy and 0.921 F1-score, outperforming current state-of-the-art models including dual-branch CNNs, entropy-enhanced CNNs, and Bi-GRU architectures. Ablation studies confirm the critical contributions of self-supervised pretraining, attention mechanisms, and domain-specific augmentations. Grad-CAM visualizations further validate the model's focus on clinically relevant Electrocardiography regions. Our results underscore SimCardioNet's potential to reduce reliance on labeled data while delivering robust, interpretable, and clinically viable Electrocardiography classification especially valuable in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.