Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41644574›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Fuzzy decision making for cross domain sentiment analysis and MABAC approach with complex T-spherical fuzzy operators.

Yina Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yina QiSchool of Software, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710129, Shaanxi, China. qiyina168@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-domain sentiment analysis is an advanced approach in natural language processing that focuses on transferring sentiment knowledge from one domain to another, where labeled data may be scarce or vague. To overcome the impact of redundant and ambiguous information about the sentiment expressions, we explore a potent approach of a fuzzy framework with robust algorithms of a decision analysis system. This article initiates an advanced decision-making approach of the multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method to aggregate human judgments or opinions precisely and accurately. To achieve the goals of the presentation, we expose the notion of complex t-spherical fuzzy set (CT-SFS), which is used to manage uncertainty and vagueness during the aggregation process. Some feasible operations of Sugeno-Weber t-norm and t-conorm are formulated under the system of complex t-spherical fuzzy information. A family of Sugeno-Weber weighted average and weighted geometric operators is also developed based on a complex t-spherical fuzzy framework. To showcase the validation and strength of the discussed mathematical models, an intelligent decision algorithm of the MABAC method is established to resolve multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems under complex t-spherical fuzzy environments. An experimental case study is discussed to evaluate different sentiment recognition methods under conflicting criteria and aggregation operators. Additionally, a comparative analysis is conducted to highlight the superiority and effectiveness of the diagnosed mathematical terminologies.

Indexed as

Complex t-spherical fuzzy valuesDecision support systemSentiment recognitionSugeno–Weber t-norm and t-conorm

Identifiers

PMID41644574
PMCPMC12887021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.