ArticleNature communications2026
Protein-protein interactions are a major source of epistasis in genetic interaction networks.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust cis-by-trans epistasis in the human plasma proteome highlights an ABO-centered interaction network.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Integrating Epistatic Interactions into Genomic Prediction of Growth and Fillet Fat Content in Common Carp.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Application of Systems Genetics to Investigate Molecular Pathology of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Review
- Protein-protein interactions are a major source of epistasis in genetic interaction networks.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic interaction and protein-protein interaction networks have proved among the most important tools for inference of gene function and genotype-phenotype relationship. It remains unclear, however, how these two networks are related to each other. Here we demonstrate that the strengths of epistatic genetic interactions between two genes strongly correlate with the binding free energies of interactions between their cognate proteins, for both yeast and human genomes. Consequently, we show that genetic interaction and protein-protein interaction networks can reciprocally predict each other. Further, we observe that functional divergence and redundancy in duplicated genes (paralogs) are reflected in the binding affinity of their interactions with other proteins and in their genetic interaction strengths. Finally, we demonstrate that the overall topologies of genetic interaction and protein-protein interaction networks significantly overlap in two topological features: modules, in which genes/proteins are organized by common function, and connectors, which link modules to each other. This opens avenues for integrated network approaches in understanding cellular processes and flow of genomic information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.