Observational studyAustralian occupational therapy journal2026
Exploring the alignment between occupational therapy using Ayres Sensory Integration® with children and occupation-centred practice: An observational study.
Observational study in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the alignment between occupational therapy using Ayres Sensory Integration® with children and occupation-centred practice: An observational study.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere is a longstanding debate about using Ayres Sensory Integration® (ASI) as an occupational therapy approach, fuelled partly by queries about its alignment with the current occupation-centred paradigm. Despite many voicing their opinions, no studies have considered the extent to which occupational therapy using ASI with children might be implemented in a way that aligns with occupation-centred practice. This study was designed to explore that alignment.
methodsThis mixed-methods study involved eight occupational therapists certified to implement ASI. Data collection involved (1) an online survey to gather demographic data and rate structural fidelity elements; (2) a review and rating of a video-recorded session using process fidelity elements and the occupation-centred practice checklist for observable items (e.g. therapist-child collaboration); and (3) a review and rating of semi-structured interview data using the same checklist for non-observable items (e.g. child- or family-chosen goals). Two coders independently analysed the data. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: No consumers were involved in this study.
findingsThe extent to which interventions aligned with occupation-centred practice varied among the participants, with partial uptake of several components observed across therapists. Some occupation-centred practice components were more consistently met, including identifying client concerns, developing trust with the child, and considering the child's unique features when planning interventions. Other components were more consistently missed, such as collaborating with caregivers, co-creating and reviewing goals, establishing occupational outcome measures, considering the client's broader context, and drawing on multiple theories and approaches to guide practice.
conclusionSome participants' therapeutic approach was more closely aligned with occupation-centred practice, evidencing the potential for occupation-centred implementation of ASI. Nevertheless, findings underscore the need to strengthen the occupational focus. Therapists may benefit from occupation-centred practice training and using the checklist presented in this study to self-monitor alignment with the profession's paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.