ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2026
Improving the management and outcomes of preschool wheeze: protocol of a prospective multicentre cohort study.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreschool wheeze and asthma are associated with substantial morbidity and impaired future lung function. Yet, wheeze is unreliably reported with high disagreement (>50%) between parental and physician observations. Objectively defining wheeze and its reversibility could enable an earlier asthma diagnosis and improve preschool wheeze management.Our primary aim is to determine in preschool children (aged 0.5-6 years) suspected of asthma whether adding WheezeScan to routine clinical assessment (vs assessment without WheezeScan) improves the diagnosis of asthma. Our primary hypothesis is that using WheezeScan in preschool children suspected of asthma is associated with increased definitive asthma diagnoses in this age group. Our secondary aims are to (a) examine the effect of using WheezeScan on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and (b) healthcare costs. Our secondary hypothesis is that using WheezeScan in preschool children suspected of asthma is associated with improved quality of life without incurring additional healthcare costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our multicentre prospective cohort study involves recruiting 102 preschool children suspected of asthma. WheezeScan, a user-friendly digital device, incorporates artificial intelligence to objectively define wheeze and its response to bronchodilators. Over 6 weeks, parents/caregivers use the WheezeScan two times per day and whenever wheezing is suspected. If wheeze is detected, an inhaled short-acting β ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Children's Health Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/23/QCHQ/100691) and the Queensland University of Technology Office of Research Ethics and Integrity approved the study. We will publish and share results with the academic and healthcare communities and relevant patient organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000904673.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.