ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2026
Can I Stay, or Must I Go Now? A Cohort Study of Discharge Appeals in a Post-Acute Skilled Nursing Facility.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPatients admitted to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for short-term rehabilitation after hospitalization often feel unprepared to return home and may appeal discharge dates set by SNFs and/or insurers. There are additional concerns that Medicare Advantage (MA) insurers may be more aggressive about discharging patients earlier compared with traditional Medicare. Yet, little has been published on the characteristics of patients who appeal and their outcomes.
designRetrospective cohort study. SETTING AND
participantsParticipants included patients admitted to a single SNF after hospitalization from March 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, who filed discharge appeals.
methodsWe collected information via chart reviews on patient demographics (eg, age, insurance coverage), comorbidities, function scores, and documented reasons for appeal. We also identified outcomes following appeal (eg, 30-day rehospitalization, death).
resultsOf 453 eligible SNF admissions, 47 (10.4%) patients filed 58 appeals [mean age 79.3 (SD = 10.6), 25 (53.2%) female, 9 (19.1%) Asian, 7 (14.9%) Black, 20 (42.6%) in traditional Medicare, 27 (57.4%) in MA]. Median (IQR) time from SNF admission to first appeal was 19.0 (15.0-30.5) days. Eleven patients (23.4%) won their appeals. The median (IQR) time from first appeal to discharge was 8 (7-13) and 4 (3-8) days among patients who won their appeals vs those who lost their final appeal, respectively. The 30-day rehospitalization and 30-day mortality rates among those who won their appeals were 0% (n = 0 of 11) and 18.2% (n = 2 of 11), respectively. Among those who lost their final appeal, rates were 27.8% (n = 10 of 36) and 0% (n = 0 of 36), respectively. The most common reason for appealing was patient and/or family/caregiver concern about discharge readiness (n = 28, 59.6%). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In this single-SNF study, 10% of post-acute patients appealed their discharge, commonly citing concerns about discharge readiness, with most ultimately losing their final appeal. This study lays the groundwork for future research examining appeals processes and outcomes on a broader scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.