ArticleContemporary clinical trials2026
Impact of clinical trial virtualization on recruitment in underserved communities for a type 2 diabetes mHealth intervention.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveApproaches to randomized clinical trial (RCT) implementation changed during the COVID-19 pandemic as clinical trials transitioned to largely virtual implementation which may continue in the future. Without careful consideration, virtual RCTs may exacerbate the historical under-representation of women, the elderly, and racial and ethnic minorities that has occurred in the past. The following study presents an approach to virtualizing an RCT for an mHealth intervention. MATERIALS AND
methodsStudy participants were recruited from Federally Qualified Health Centers in medically underserved areas of the New York City metropolitan area. Recruitment began in January 2020 but was paused in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic's onset. The research team developed a virtual protocol for recruitment, onboarding, and study implementation.
resultsStudy participants were predominantly from immigrant, low-income, and racial and ethnic minority groups. Our virtualization approach included an easier-to-understand consent form, expanded virtual training materials, and greater one-on-one attention during training. Despite the transition to virtual protocols, we did not detect statistically significant differences in key demographic characteristics, clinical factors, or mobile device proficiency between recruitment modalities, though the small in-person sample size (n = 21) limits definitive conclusions about selection bias. DISCUSSION: Our study represents an early investigation into how the change from in-person clinical trial recruitment and study implementation to virtual during the COVID-19 pandemic may impact recruitment of participants from medically underserved communities into RCTs.
conclusionThis approach may be used in future trials testing mHealth and other technological interventions without exacerbating the under-representation of medically underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.