ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2026
"It's more than just being in a place, it's more like a peace of mind": Ontological security among residents of a transitional housing program implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHomelessness is a visible and persistent manifestation of social and structural inequity in the United States. When individuals experience homelessness, their ontological security, which refers to the sense of constancy, safety, and trust in daily life, is often deeply eroded. We explored the connections between embodied experiences and ontological security among residents of a transitional housing program implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews between November 2022 and October 2023 with 24 former residents of Operation Safer Ground (OSG), an Alameda County, California program that provided non-congregate supportive housing for medically vulnerable people experiencing homelessness. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsParticipants described OSG residences as supporting physical wellbeing, comfort, and restoration. When experienced daily, these features contributed to embodied ease and ontological security for most participants. Rules and security measures often enhanced feelings of safety and order, but some residents found them infantilizing and destabilizing through inconsistent enforcement. OSG's low-barrier model of care produced mixed effects: for some, proximity to fellow residents' substance use, mental health crisis, or death heightened vigilance and anxiety; for others, being housed with family members and pets stabilized identity and strengthened continuity.
conclusionsBy exploring participants' embodied responses to the OSG program's physical environment, rules and regulations, and communal living, we were able to chart how experiences that evoke visceral feelings of safety, control, and well-being can influence ontological security in the context of a transitional housing program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.