Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41643187›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2026

Key Components and Barriers in Web-Based Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training: Systematic Narrative Review.

Olivier Ferlatte, Emmanuelle Gareau, Keven Lee, Kinda Wassef, John Lindsay Oliffe, Hannah Kia, Brock Dumville

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivier FerlatteÉcole de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2721-4757
Emmanuelle GareauÉcole de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3118-6098
Keven LeeÉcole de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6386-5410
Kinda WassefÉcole de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6379-3033
John Lindsay OliffeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-4003
Hannah KiaSchool of Social Work, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-4907
Brock DumvilleSuicide Prevention Centre of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5485-7055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGatekeeper training programs (GTPs) are a key component of contemporary suicide prevention strategies, equipping community members and non-mental health professionals with the skills to identify, engage with, and refer individuals at risk of suicide. Increasingly, these programs are delivered via the web, offering a compelling alternative to in-person training through greater scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness. However, little consensus exists regarding the design, modes of delivery, and implementation strategies of web-based GTPs. Further, there is a limited understanding of which components affect their usability and engagement.

objectiveThis systematic narrative review aims to identify the key components-including facilitators and barriers-of web-based GTPs.

methodsWe systematically searched web-based databases (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) to identify peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2025 that involved web-based GTPs. After screening, 59 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using content analysis to identify key components and barriers affecting the delivery and receipt of web-based GTPs.

resultsResults were organized under 3 categories: design, content, and pedagogy. Key design considerations emphasized accessibility for diverse learning styles and digital literacy levels, customizability for different user groups, privacy protection, and the long-term sustainability of training content and delivery platforms. Core training content covered four domains: (1) suicide-related knowledge (eg, prevalence, myths, and at-risk groups), (2) gatekeeping skills (eg, understanding risk factors, recognizing warning signs, problem-solving and safety planning), (3) resource awareness (eg, available local resources and referral procedures), and (4) general mental health education (eg, mental fitness, mindfulness, and self-care strategies for gatekeepers). In terms of pedagogy, the reviewed studies used a wide range of strategies that comprised interactive learning activities (eg, simulation, practice exercises), periodic knowledge checks (eg, quizzes), and reinforcement mechanisms (eg, booster sessions). Additionally, fostering a sense of community (eg, online support spaces or discussion forums) and promoting trainees' autonomy (eg, self-paced training) were highlighted as key components of training delivery.

conclusionsWeb-based GTPs represent a promising avenue for expanding access to suicide prevention training. Their effectiveness may be strengthened through the integration of frameworks tailored to web-based learning environments, as well as interactive and user-centered design elements that support learning and retention. Future research should examine the acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability of these programs, while also refining their adaptation for diverse populations. In this regard, co-design approaches could facilitate the tailoring of such programs to the needs and specificities of their target populations. Overall, enhancing the design and delivery of web-based GTPs may ultimately improve their contribution to suicide prevention efforts.

Indexed as

GatekeepingInternetSuicide PreventionHumansgatekeeper trainingnarrative reviewonlinesuicidesuicide preventionweb-based

Identifiers

PMID41643187
PMCPMC12921433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.