Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41643062›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of a Digital Falls Prevention Program Versus Usual Care to Improve Balance, Falls Risk, and Function in Older Adults: Protocol for the Keep-On-Keep-Up Randomized Controlled Trial.

Emma Stanmore, Amelia Parchment, Bolanle Odebiyi, Peter Bower, Chloe French, Chunhu Shi, Saima Bashir, Saima Ahmed, Dawn Dowding, Jo Dumville and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Emma StanmoreManchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4522-5292
Amelia ParchmentNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6743-6912
Bolanle OdebiyiSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PY, United Kingdom, 0161 306 7811.ORCID 0009-0009-3215-3937
Peter BowerNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9558-3349
Chloe FrenchSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PY, United Kingdom, 0161 306 7811.ORCID 0000-0003-2303-7474
Chunhu ShiNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0151-0451
Saima BashirManchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4558-9432
Saima AhmedNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6206-3184
Dawn DowdingNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5672-8605
Jo DumvilleNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6546-3685
Roman KislovNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2525-7673
Alex ThompsonSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PY, United Kingdom, 0161 306 7811.ORCID 0000-0003-4930-5107
Dawn A SkeltonGlasgow Caledonian University, School of Health and Life Sciences, Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6223-9840
Margaret ClarkeSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PY, United Kingdom, 0161 306 7811.ORCID 0000-0002-1470-8654
Chris ToddManchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6645-4505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Falls are the primary cause of fatal and nonfatal accidental injuries in older adults. The World Falls Prevention Guidelines recommend balance-challenging, functional exercise programs as a key strategy for falls prevention, but access, uptake, and adherence to these programs in community settings remain suboptimal. Keep-On-Keep-Up (KOKU), a digital, National Health Service-approved program, was codeveloped with older adults and therapists to provide progressive, evidence-based exercises and to raise awareness of falls prevention strategies. Objective: This trial aims to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the KOKU digital strength and balance program for improving balance, enhancing physical function, and reducing falls risk among community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This is a 2-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. A total of 196 community-dwelling older adults 60 years and older will be randomized to either the intervention group, comprising a digital strength and balance program (KOKU) alongside standard care (strength and balance exercise advice and a falls prevention leaflet), or to a control group, receiving standard care only. Participants receiving the intervention will be asked to exercise 3 times per week following the tailored and progressive program. Randomization will take place after recruitment and baseline data collection. The trial's primary outcome measure is balance function (Berg Balance Score) at 12 weeks post randomization. Secondary trial outcomes include lower limb strength, health care utilization and health-related quality of life, self-reported concerns about falling, self-reported physical activity, falls risk, pain, mood, fatigue, self-reported falls, and acceptability and usability of the KOKU program. Intention-to-treat analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis will be employed for trial data analysis. Qualitative interviews and focus groups will be undertaken with around 10 care providers and 13 participants to further understand views of the intervention and trial processes. Results: This study began recruitment in July 2024 and concluded in March 2025, recruiting a total of 202 participants (102 intervention group and 100 control group). Following protocol publication, data compilation and analysis will be conducted, with results anticipated to be published in 2027. Conclusions: This trial will provide important evidence on whether a digital strength and balance program can improve balance and related outcomes in older adults compared with usual care.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsExercise TherapyPostural BalanceAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicaccidental falls/preventionageddigital health interventionmobile appspostural balancerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41643062
PMCPMC12875423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.