Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642958›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

From patient voices to policy: Data analytics reveals patterns in Ontario's hospital feedback.

Pourya Momtaz, Mohammad Noaeen, Konrad Samsel, Neil Seeman, Robert Cribb, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Amol Verma, Dionne M Aleman, Zahra Shakeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pourya MomtazInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mohammad NoaeenInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2993-6393
Konrad SamselInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7901-2199
Neil SeemanInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert CribbInvestigative Journalism Bureau, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Syed Ishtiaque AhmedDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amol VermaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dionne M AlemanInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zahra ShakeriInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient satisfaction is a central measure of high-performing healthcare systems, yet real-world evaluations at scale remain challenging. In this study, we analyzed 122,194 de-identified patient reviews from 45 Ontario general hospitals between January 2015 and July 2022. We applied a natural language processing (NLP) pipeline using a clinical named entity recognition (NER) model fine-tuned on biomedical literature to extract references to diseases, symptoms, and medical procedures from patient reviews. Geospatial analysis was conducted to examine sentiment patterns based on regional census data related to low-income status and visible-minority composition. Our primary objective was to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced patient satisfaction trends, with a specific focus on clinical units and hospitals serving marginalized populations. We assessed changes in the proportion of positive comments across time periods and socioeconomic groups using multivariate logistic regression. Our findings show that over 80% of the hospitals studied had fewer than 50% positive reviews, highlighting possible systemic gaps in patient needs. Interestingly, the proportion of negative reviews decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting possible changes in patient expectations or increased appreciation for healthcare workers. However, certain units, such as dentistry and radiology, experienced more negative ratings as a proportion of their total reviews. 'Anxiety' emerged as a recurrent concern in negative reviews, especially during the start of the pandemic, pointing to the growing awareness of mental health needs. Based on our geospatial analysis, hospitals located in regions with higher percentages of visible minority and low-income populations initially saw higher positive review proportions before COVID-19, but this trend reversed after 2020. Our statistical models confirmed that these shifts were significant, particularly for low-income-serving hospitals. Collectively, these results demonstrate how large-scale unstructured data can identify fundamental drivers of patient satisfaction, while underscoring the urgent need for adaptive strategies to address anxiety and combat systemic inequities.

Identifiers

PMID41642958
PMCPMC12875584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.