ArticlePloS one2026
Streamlining psychosocial risk assessment: An exploratory adaptation of the COPSOQ III for Flemish healthcare workers.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare workers are particularly vulnerable to psychosocial stress due to high emotional and cognitive demands, staffing shortages, and complex care responsibilities. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) is a widely used tool for assessing psychosocial risks at work, but its extended Flemish version has not been systematically evaluated in healthcare settings, and evidence on its psychometric performance in this context remains limited.
objectiveThis exploratory study aimed to examine the factor structure and internal consistency of the extended Flemish version of the COPSOQ III among healthcare workers in Flanders, Belgium, and to provide initial psychometric evidence.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 242 employees across three healthcare institutions. Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on polychoric correlations (oblimin rotation) to derive a revised factor structure of the extended Flemish COPSOQ III. Internal consistency of the resulting dimensions was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, ordinal alpha, and McDonald's omega (total and hierarchical). Multiple imputation was used in sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the factor structure and reliability estimates to missing data. A preliminary confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted as a supplementary, internal check of the proposed structure, rather than as a full confirmatory validation, given the limited sample size.
resultsEFAs supported retention of the original COPSOQ III domain framework while indicating meaningful within-domain refinements, including merged, split, and reallocated dimensions; the number of dimensions was reduced from 45 to 34. Most resulting dimensions showed acceptable internal consistency (ordinal α and ω_total generally ≥ 0.70), although a small number of brief scales showed lower reliability. Sensitivity analyses using multiple imputation yielded highly similar factor solutions and reliability estimates. Domain-specific CFAs provided preliminary support for the revised structures with acceptable fit on commonly used indices (e.g., CFI/TLI, RMSEA, SRMR), but these results should be interpreted cautiously as internal checks rather than definitive confirmation.
conclusionThis exploratory study suggests that the extended Flemish version of COPSOQ III, with an adapted and more parsimonious structure, shows generally acceptable reliability and promising, though preliminary, evidence of construct validity for assessing psychosocial risks in healthcare settings. The adapted structure enhances its practical applicability while preserving theoretical integrity. Further research with larger and more diverse samples is recommended to confirm these findings in broader occupational contexts, test the stability of the proposed structure, and explore the utility of shorter versions in broader occupational contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.