ArticlePloS one2026
Repeated pattern detection on fabric: A survey and novel approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern textile industries frequently apply patterns, such as brand logos or motifs, in near-regular arrangements to create visually appealing products. Consequently, the application of computer vision for pattern recognition is highly valuable for automating production chains and reducing waste. In this work, we address the challenging task of automatically detecting repeating patterns on fabric images, accounting for real-world complexities such as variable lighting and intentional pattern variance. We begin with an in-depth literature review on repeated pattern detection, highlighting current trends, organizing them into a hierarchy of sub-tasks, and discussing the novelty of each paper. Subsequently, we propose a novel method to solve our specific instance of this problem, focusing on detecting patterns with sub-pixel accuracy. We conduct extensive experiments to compare its performance against several baselines from the literature. Our method can be applied with high precision to real-world problems without requiring training data, instead using an automatic calibration procedure with limited human supervision. On a small synthetic dataset, our method detects repeated patterns with a 96% recall rate and an average alignment error of less than 0.5 pixels in just a few seconds, making it competitive with all tested baselines. Finally, we release our dataset and the code for its generation to encourage further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.