Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Repeated pattern detection on fabric: A survey and novel approach.

Ebru Ayyurek, Matteo Marcuzzo, Alessandro Zangari, Lorenzo Giudice, Gianluca Bigaglia, Mara Pistellato, Andrea Albarelli, Andrea Gasparetto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ebru AyyurekCa' Foscari Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Mestre, VE, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9266-6906
Matteo MarcuzzoCa' Foscari Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Mestre, VE, Italy.
Alessandro ZangariCa' Foscari Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Mestre, VE, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3634-6607
Lorenzo GiudiceInterconnected Nord-Est Innovation Ecosystem/Temporary Project Centre/Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venezia, VE, Italy.
Gianluca BigagliaInterconnected Nord-Est Innovation Ecosystem/Temporary Project Centre/Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venezia, VE, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7089-7632
Mara PistellatoCa' Foscari Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Mestre, VE, Italy.
Andrea AlbarelliCa' Foscari Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Mestre, VE, Italy.
Andrea GasparettoCa' Foscari Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Mestre, VE, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4986-0442

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern textile industries frequently apply patterns, such as brand logos or motifs, in near-regular arrangements to create visually appealing products. Consequently, the application of computer vision for pattern recognition is highly valuable for automating production chains and reducing waste. In this work, we address the challenging task of automatically detecting repeating patterns on fabric images, accounting for real-world complexities such as variable lighting and intentional pattern variance. We begin with an in-depth literature review on repeated pattern detection, highlighting current trends, organizing them into a hierarchy of sub-tasks, and discussing the novelty of each paper. Subsequently, we propose a novel method to solve our specific instance of this problem, focusing on detecting patterns with sub-pixel accuracy. We conduct extensive experiments to compare its performance against several baselines from the literature. Our method can be applied with high precision to real-world problems without requiring training data, instead using an automatic calibration procedure with limited human supervision. On a small synthetic dataset, our method detects repeated patterns with a 96% recall rate and an average alignment error of less than 0.5 pixels in just a few seconds, making it competitive with all tested baselines. Finally, we release our dataset and the code for its generation to encourage further research in this area.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPattern Recognition, AutomatedTextilesAlgorithmsDetection AlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41642916
PMCPMC12875591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.