ArticlePloS one2026
Factors and determinants of primary care to tertiary care referrals in Singapore: A multi-centre analysis using artificial intelligence-powered large language models.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs Singapore adopts a population health approach under Healthier Singapore (Healthier SG), optimizing healthcare resources is crucial. We examined referral reasons (using large language models [LLM]), wait times, and analyse factors affecting referrals from primary to tertiary care.
methodsIn 2023, 1,063,646 patient visits from seven primary care clinics in Singapore were analysed. Patient demographics, clinic, physician characteristics, referral volumes and wait times were extracted. LLM Claude 3.5 Sonnet was utilized to identify and classify top referral reasons within the most frequently referred specialties based on referral notes. Chi-square tests identified differences in referral rates among categorical variables, while a generalised linear model (GLM) with an identity link (normal distribution) determined factors influencing referrals by physicians.
findingsAround 1 in 5 visits resulted in a referral (n = 210,839, 19.8%), achieving 76.0% attendance rate. Referrals peaked among patients aged 60-70 years. Male (Odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.89) and Malay (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.70-0.72, compared with Chinese) patients were less likely to be referred. Significant variations were observed among clinics (p < 0.001). Ophthalmology (11.1%), orthopaedic surgery (10.3%), and emergency (10.0%) were the most referred specialties, with blurred vision (n = 7,461), abnormal diabetic retinopathy screening (n = 5,266) and pregnancy and antenatal care (n = 3,959) being the top referral reasons. 51.5% were routine referrals. Wait time averaged 52.7 days with 48.9% meeting targets, with long wait times for Gastroenterology & Hepatology, and Endocrinology. On average, each additional year of physician experience was associated with a reduction of 4.45 referrals per physician (95% CI: 1.40-7.58, p = 0.005).
interpretationOur study highlighted disparities in referrals rates, patterns, and wait times. Continuing education and support for primary care is paramount. Resource allocation should be tailored to meet the population needs, with further research needed to ensure timely and appropriate referrals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.