ArticleDevelopmental psychology2026
Identifying patterns and predictors of social health in adolescence using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.
Article in Developmental psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contextualizing the adolescent social brain: Links to social health using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social health, having an adequate quantity and quality of social relationships, is essential for well-being but understudied during adolescence compared to adulthood. We sought to identify patterns and predictors of social health by characterizing peer relationships among 10,050 adolescents (10-13 years old, 4,815 girls, 53.68% non-Hispanic White) in Year 2 of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. To characterize social health profiles, we applied latent profile analysis on peer variables collected in Year 2: number of friends (close, general), aggression, victimization, relationships with prosocial and rule-breaking peers, and support. We then assessed whether loneliness (baseline, Year 2), family conflict (baseline, Year 2), and participant sex predicted profile membership. Fit indices supported a three-class solution: a "selective" class (∼60% of the sample) characterized by values below sample means but within population norms across variables (e.g., number of friends), a "robust" class (∼30%) characterized by high numbers of friends, and a "concerning" class (∼10%) characterized by high levels of peer aggression and victimization. Lonely adolescents were more likely to be in the concerning group and less likely to be in the robust group. Youth with more family conflict and boys were more likely to be in the concerning group; girls were more likely to be in the selective group. These findings reveal profiles of peer relationships in a large representative sample, providing a template for characterizing social health as adolescents begin to build intimate peer relationships. The results also highlight individual differences in social health profiles, which can inform targets to improve adolescent social health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.