Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642807›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Hidden risks associated with occupational pesticide exposure in women with breast cancer: High frequency of the Luminal B molecular subtype and occurrence of poor prognostic features.

Isabella C Cazagranda, Rafaela Frederico de Almeida, Lucca L Smaniotto, Maria Paula de Andrade Berny, Carolina Coradi, Daniel Rech, Carolina Panis, Guilherme F Silveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isabella C CazagrandaGrupo de Imunologia Molecular, Celular e Inteligência Artificial, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ-PR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Rafaela Frederico de AlmeidaLaboratório de Biologia de Tumores, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Campus de Francisco Beltrão, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil.
Lucca L SmaniottoLaboratório de Biologia de Tumores, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Campus de Francisco Beltrão, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil.
Maria Paula de Andrade BernyLaboratório de Biologia de Tumores, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Campus de Francisco Beltrão, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil.
Carolina CoradiLaboratório de Biologia de Tumores, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Campus de Francisco Beltrão, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil.
Daniel RechLaboratório de Biologia de Tumores, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Campus de Francisco Beltrão, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil.
Carolina PanisLaboratório de Biologia de Tumores, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Campus de Francisco Beltrão, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil.
Guilherme F SilveiraGrupo de Imunologia Molecular, Celular e Inteligência Artificial, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ-PR), Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-0563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human pesticide exposure is a common event in countries with strength conventional agriculture, such as Brazil. Despite evidence on the negative impact of pesticides on human health, the country stands out among the top three pesticide consumers globally. The implications of this scenario on rural workers health, particularly women, is completely neglected, resulting in chronic illness such as breast cancer.

objectiveIn this study, we analyzed the impact of occupational/household chronic exposure to pesticides on the clinicopathological profile of breast cancer in rural women from Paraná southwest, a predominantly rural landscape with large pesticide uses.

methodsA total of 349 women were included in the study. After a structured interview, women were categorized as exposed (n = 208) or unexposed (n = 141) to pesticides. Clinicopathological data were collected from medical records. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to characterize and compare the sample. The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate differences between the molecular subtypes and clinicopathological variables of patients.

resultsExposed patients had a prevalence of the Luminal B subtype (32.83%), while unexposed patients had a prevalence of the Luminal A molecular subtype (37.78%, p <= 0.05). Exposed patients also had higher disease recurrence (10.19%), chemoresistance (21.26%), than unexposed patients (p <= 0.05). Breast cancer patients exposed to pesticides were also more likely to have distant metastases (1.4 times) and lymph node invasion (1.3 times) compared to patients not exposed.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that pesticide exposure favors the occurrence of more aggressive breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOccupational ExposurePesticidesAdultAgedBrazilFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk FactorsRural PopulationPesticides

Identifiers

PMID41642807
PMCPMC12875504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.