ArticleCancer research communications2026
The MATTERS Trial: Safety and Tolerability of Whole-Body Hyperthermia at 41.50°C in Combination with Chemotherapy in Metastatic Cancer Patients.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07564440 (Clinical and Biological Safety Study of the BTT Hyperthermia in Adult Subjects), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Biological Safety Study of the BTT Hyperthermia in Adult Subjects
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhole-body hyperthermia (WBHT) is a promising therapy for advanced malignancies, including metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This first-in-human study evaluated the safety and tolerability of repeated WBHT sessions at 41.50°C for various treatment durations and in combination with standard-of-care chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND
methodsTwelve patients with advanced solid tumors, primarily metastatic PDAC, completed the study. WBHT was administered using an innovative medical device (TempoCure, ElmediX) as monotherapy or with standard-of-care chemotherapy in escalating durations of 2, 4, and 6 hours, in four cohorts. Safety was assessed through adverse event (AE) monitoring, serious AE (SAE) reporting, and comprehensive clinical and laboratory evaluations up to a 10-week follow-up. Tolerability was evaluated according to whether patients were able to complete all planned WBHT cycles, with or without concomitant chemotherapy, without the need for dose modifications or treatment interruptions.
resultsThe WBHT treatment was well tolerated, with most patients completing scheduled treatments despite advanced disease. The most frequent AEs were fatigue, hypokalemia, nausea, and diarrhea. Initial decubitus ulcers led to improved patient handling protocols. No clear increase in AE or SAE incidence was associated with longer WBHT durations or chemotherapy combination. The trend toward fewer AEs in later treatments likely reflects a procedural learning curve.
conclusionsWBHT administered with the TempoCure system at 41.50°C for 2, 4, and 6 hours is safe and tolerable alone or in combination with chemotherapy, in patients with advanced cancer refractory to prior treatments. These findings support further investigation in upcoming randomized trials designed to evaluate efficacy in metastatic PDAC. SIGNIFICANCE: The MATTERS trial demonstrates that WBHT at 41.50°C, delivered with the TempoCure device, is a safe and well-tolerated treatment for advanced malignancies, particularly in patients with refractory metastatic PDAC. These findings support the integration of WBHT with standard chemotherapy regimens, paving the way for future efficacy trials aimed at improving therapeutic outcomes in challenging cancer populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.