Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642679›Full record

ArticleGenetics2026

esBAF and INO80C fine-tune subcompartments and differentially regulate enhancer-promoter interactions.

Braulio Bonilla, Benjamin J Patty, Snehal V Sambare, Job Dekker, Thomas G Fazzio, Sarah J Hainer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Braulio BonillaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260  United States.
Benjamin J PattyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260  United States.
Snehal V SambareDepartment of Systems Biology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, United States.
Job DekkerDepartment of Systems Biology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5631-0698
Thomas G FazzioDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, United States.
Sarah J HainerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260  United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0503-1183

Funding

Roles of Chromatin Regulation in Embryonic Stem Cell Self-RenewalR01HD072122 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Thomas G Fazzio · 2012 to 2026
$5.9M
Chromatin-mediated mechanisms of transcription regulation in ES cellsR35GM133732 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Sarah Jane Hainer · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
High-Throughput Computing for Genomics and Bioinformatics ResearchS10OD028483 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LEE, ADRIAN V · 2021 to 2021
$574k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNGSNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133732NIH HHS DK107980NIH HHS HG003143NIH HHS HG011536NIH HHS R01 HD072122NIH HHS R35 GM133732NIH HHS S10OD028483University of Pittsburgh RRID: SCR_018301University of Pittsburgh Center for Research Computing RRID:SCR_022735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome is compacted in the nucleus through a hierarchical chromatin organization, ranging from chromosome territories to compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs), and individual nucleosomes. Nucleosome remodeling complexes hydrolyze ATP to translocate DNA and thereby mobilize histone proteins. While nucleosome remodeling complexes have been extensively studied for their roles in regulating nucleosome positioning and accessibility, their contributions to higher-order chromatin architecture remain less well understood. Here, we investigate the roles of two key nucleosome remodelers, esBAF and INO80C, in shaping 3D genome organization in mouse embryonic stem cells. Using Hi-C, we find that loss of either remodeler has minimal effects on global compartment or TAD structures. In contrast, subcompartment organization is notably altered, suggesting that esBAF and INO80C contribute to finer-scale chromatin topology. To overcome the limited resolution of Hi-C for detecting regulatory loops, we employed promoter capture Micro-C (PCMC), which revealed that loss of either esBAF or INO80C alters a subset of promoter-anchored looping interactions. Although these changes occur at distinct genomic loci for each remodeler, the affected sites are commonly enriched for bivalent chromatin regions bound by OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG (OSN), as well as BRG1 and INO80 themselves. Together, our findings reveal that esBAF and INO80C selectively influence subcompartment identity and enhancer-promoter communication at key regulatory loci, highlighting a previously underappreciated role for nucleosome remodelers in higher-order chromatin organization.

Indexed as

ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesEnhancer Elements, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription FactorsAnimalsChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsNuclear ProteinsNucleosomesATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesINO80 protein, mouseNuclear ProteinsNucleosomesSmarca4 protein, mouseTranscription Factorschromatinenhancer–promoter interactionsremodelersstem cellssubcompartments

Identifiers

PMID41642679
PMCPMC13050208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.