ArticleCritical care explorations2026
Association Between Positive End-Expiratory Pressure at Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Initiation and Liberation Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceThe optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains uncertain.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the association between initial PEEP settings at ECMO initiation and the rate of successful ECMO liberation in patients with severe ARDS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsWe conducted a post hoc analysis of the multicenter Japan Chest CT for ARDS Requiring Venovenous ECMO (J-CARVE) registry. Adult patients with severe ARDS treated with venovenous ECMO between 2012 and 2022 at 24 institutions were included. Participants were categorized into three groups according to PEEP at ECMO initiation: low (< 8 cm H2O), middle (8-10 cm H2O), and high (> 10 cm H2O). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was successful liberation from ECMO within 30 days. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations. Secondary outcomes included 60-day mortality, duration of ECMO support, and duration of mechanical ventilation.
resultsAmong 683 patients analyzed, the overall ECMO liberation rate at 30 days was 69.2%. Liberation rates were 57.8% (103/178), 73.5% (259/352), and 72.5% (111/153) in the low, middle, and high PEEP groups, respectively. After adjustment, the low group had a significantly lower likelihood of successful ECMO liberation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.81) compared with the middle group. No significant difference was observed between the high and middle groups (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.58-1.10). The low group had longer ECMO duration; however, 60-day mortality and hospital length of stay did not differ significantly among groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Lower PEEP levels at ECMO initiation were associated with reduced likelihood of successful ECMO liberation compared with moderate PEEP, whereas estimates for high vs. moderate PEEP were not statistically significant. These findings support avoiding insufficiently low PEEP and underscore the need for prospective studies to refine optimal PEEP strategies in patients with severe ARDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.