Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642564›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2026

Defining Safe and Effective Cefazolin Dosing Regimens for MSSA Infections in the CNS: Leveraging Sparse Real-World Data and PBPK Modeling.

Samuel Dubinsky, Mark McIntyre, Min-Soo Kim, Laura Hawryluk, Andrea Edginton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel DubinskyDepartment of Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. sam.dubinsky@nshealth.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3847-4899
Mark McIntyreSinai Health-University Health Network Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Min-Soo KimSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
Laura HawrylukCritical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrea EdgintonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveInfections in the central nervous system (CNS) are serious and carry a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Though commonly used as prophylaxis for neurosurgical interventions, cefazolin as a treatment for CNS infections due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) has been debated owing to the perceived inability to achieve adequate concentrations at the site of infection. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the dose-exposure-response relationship of cefazolin in the CNS.

methodsTo leverage sparse data of cefazolin in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and derive an understanding of the dose-exposure-response profile in the CNS, a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was created in PK-Sim. Simulations were performed using standard cefazolin dosing of 2000 mg every 8 h and alternative regimens to maximize the probability of target attainment (PTA). The pharmacodynamic target used was 100% fT > MIC (100% of free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration). Furthermore, a neurotoxicity threshold of ≥ 300 mg/L and ≥ 30 mg/L for trough concentrations was set as the safety indicator in plasma and CSF, respectively.

resultsThe cefazolin CSF-PBPK model was successfully validated such that predicted CSF:plasma ratios were within a 1.5-fold error compared with the observed values. In addition, the median predicted CSF:epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) concentration ratio was 2.52, compared with an observed value of 2.8. In silico simulations demonstrate that intermittent doses of 2000 mg every 6 h or a continuous infusion of 8-10 g/day may be required to ensure 90% PTA for MSSA to a MIC ≤ 2 mg/L. Predicted plasma and CSF concentrations were well below concentrations associated with neurotoxicity.

conclusionsThis study is the first to use sparse observed CNS data to develop a mechanistic model to describe the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in the CSF. This work supports existing research on the viability of cefazolin as a therapeutic alternative for CNS infections attributed to MSSA and can be used for future clinical trial planning.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinModels, BiologicalStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugFirst Generation CephalosporinsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinFirst Generation Cephalosporins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.