Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642548›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Conscience, Care, and Code: Moral Theology, AI, and Ethical Decision-Making at the Thresholds of Life.

Ivan Efreaim A Gozum

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ivan Efreaim A GozumInstitute of Religion, University of Santo Tomas, 1008, Sampaloc, Manila, Philippines. iagozum@ust.edu.ph.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-2752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare decisions at the beginning and end of life pose enduring moral challenges that are increasingly intensified by the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice. This article examines these challenges through a moral-theological understanding of conscience, emphasizing human dignity, moral agency, and responsibility. Drawing primarily from Catholic moral theology, I examine how AI-driven tools in prenatal screening, reproductive technologies, end-of-life care, and prognostic decision-making can influence, constrain, or supplant conscientious judgment among healthcare professionals and patients. While AI offers significant benefits in efficiency and accuracy, it also risks fostering moral distancing, automation bias, and reducing ethical discernment to algorithmic outputs. I argue that conscience must remain a critically formed and relational capacity rather than a function delegated to technology. The article proposes a theologically grounded framework for integrating AI into healthcare that preserves moral discernment, safeguards vulnerable human life, and promotes ethically humane care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBeginning-of-lifeBioethicsConscienceEnd-of-lifeHealthcare ethics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.