ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2026
Intensity-modulated proton therapy for patients with unresectable giant (≥ 10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis from two high-volume centers.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnresectable giant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a poor prognosis, and few effective treatment methods are available. In this study, the clinical efficacy of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) was assessed.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted on 71 consecutive patients with giant HCC treated with IMPT at two medical centers from September 2019 to December 2022. The outcomes analyzed included liver and gastrointestinal toxicity, objective response rate (ORR), local control (LC), overall survival (OS), intrahepatic recurrence-free survival (IHRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).
resultsThe ORR was 90.2%. The one-year and two-year LC rates were 95.0% and 86.5%, respectively. The one-year and two-year OS rates were 80.0% and 53.8%, respectively, with a median OS of 26.7 months (95% CI 20.8-32.7). At one and two years, the IHRFS rates were 47.4% and 26.0%, and the DMFS rates were 57.7% and 36.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that ECOG performance status (p = 0.008) and complete response (CR) after IMPT were independently associated with OS (p = 0.039). Two cases (2.8%) of Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity were observed. The incidence of liver failure after IMPT was 12.7%, of which 6.1% were considered radiation related.
conclusionsIMPT has potential for treating giant HCC. Despite the excellent LC and ORR, intrahepatic recurrence and distant metastasis remain significant factors affecting survival. More aggressive follow-up and additional therapeutic strategies are necessary, particularly for patients who do not achieve CR after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41642535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.