Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642524›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Bioinformatics Workflow for Co-Transcriptome Analysis of Plant-Bacterial Interactions.

Ying Tang, Kenichi Tsuda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ying TangNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Hubei Key Laboratory of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Kenichi TsudaNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Hubei Key Laboratory of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. tsuda@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptomic profiling of plant-bacterial interactions provides critical insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying parasitism, commensalism, and mutualism. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) enables the simultaneous analysis of plant and bacterial transcriptomes during colonization; however, integrated computational workflows specifically tailored for co-transcriptome analysis remain limited. Here, we present a step-by-step bioinformatics pipeline for analyzing co-transcriptome landscapes in plant-bacterial interactions. This workflow includes: (1) quality control and processing of raw RNA-seq data from both plant host and in-planta bacterial populations; (2) statistical analyses for differential gene expression; (3) prediction of orthologous bacterial genes and functional annotation of bacterial transcripts using the KEGG database; (4) integration and comparative analysis across multiple bacterial strains; and (5) correlation-based analysis of transcriptional dynamics between plants and bacteria. Designed for researchers with basic familiarity with command-line tools and R programming, this pipeline enables comprehensive analysis of plant-bacterial transcriptional interplay and facilitates hypothesis generation in both pathogenic and symbiotic contexts.

Indexed as

BacteriaComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHost-Pathogen InteractionsPlantsTranscriptomeSoftwareSymbiosisWorkflowCo-transcriptomicsHost-pathogen interactionsIn-planta bacterial transcriptomePlant–bacterial interactionsRNA-seq pipeline

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.