ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Accuracy of blind approach and ultrasound-guided techniques for pudendal nerve block in cadaveric cats - a pilot study.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This blinded, randomized and prospective cadaveric pilot study compared the accuracy of a blind approach for pudendal nerve block (PNB–B) with that of the ultrasound–guided technique (PNB–US) in cats. Two male cat cadavers were used for a preliminary anatomical study to identify palpable bony landmarks, while eight additional cadavers were employed for the experimental phase. Each hemipelvis was randomly assigned to one of the two techniques: PNB–US, performed according to the deep dorsolateral method described by Adami et al. (J Feline Med Surg 15:901–907, 2013), or the PNB–B, developed based on the preliminary anatomical findings, identifying the application point laterally to the sacrococcygeal joint. Block accuracy was assessed by dye spread, considering the nerve branches stained in each approach. The success rate was 87.5% (7/8) for PNB–B and 75% (6/8) for PNB–US. In the injections considered accurate in PNB–B, dye was deposited at the point of confluence of sacral nerve branches forming the pudendal nerve, while in PNB–US the pudendal nerve was stained near the exit of the pelvis. The ischial nerve was inadvertently stained in 75% (6/8) of PNB–B and 25% (2/8) of PNB–US injections. These findings indicate that PNB–B can be considered an effective alternative to the ultrasound–guided technique, although, in clinical settings, it may produce motor blockade due to unintended ischial nerve involvement. The results provide preliminary data to support future in vivo clinical studies aimed at confirming the safety and analgesic efficacy of this novel blind technique in cats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.