ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Transthoracic echocardiography measurement versus balloon occlusive diameter for atrial septal defect: experience from a Vietnamese cohort (Vietnamese cohort: TTE vs balloon ASD sizing).
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate sizing of atrial septal defects (ASDs) is essential for safe transcatheter closure. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is widely available but often considered to underestimate ASD size compared with balloon occlusive diameter (BOD). This study aimed to assess agreement between TTE and BOD in a large Vietnamese cohort using standardized imaging protocols.We conducted a cross-sectional study of 383 patients with secundum ASD undergoing transcatheter closure at Da Nang Hospital (2015–2022). ASD size was measured by TTE and BOD (stop-flow technique). Agreement was assessed by Bland–Altman plots and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlations with ASD closing device size were analyzed using Pearson’s coefficient.The mean ASD diameter was 15.3 ± 7.5 mm by TTE and 16.9 ± 8.4 mm by BOD (p < 0.001). Agreement was strong overall (ICC = 0.87), higher in patients < 18 years (ICC = 0.83) than in adults (ICC = 0.72). Bland–Altman analysis showed minimal bias, though discrepancies increased with larger ASDs. ASD closing device size correlated almost perfectly with BOD (r = 0.99, p < 0.001) and strongly with TTE (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). TOST confirmed equivalence for defects < 20 mm within ± 2 mm (Δ = 0.62 mm, 90% CI 0.30–0.94, p < 0.001), whereas larger defects did not meet equivalence at ± 10% but achieved it under hybrid margins (± 2 mm for < 10 mm, ± 20% for ≥ 10 mm). No proportional bias was detected, and concordance remained good (Lin’s CCC = 0.857).TTE slightly underestimates ASD size compared with BOD but demonstrates high concordance, particularly in pediatric and small-to-moderate defects. TTE can reliably guide device selection, reducing the need for routine balloon sizing. Selective use of BOD or advanced imaging is advisable for large defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41642426What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.