Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642377›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2026

Updates on niosomes in interfering nucleic acid delivery for cancer treatment: A comprehensive review and future perspectives.

Reena Gupta, Haneen Fadhil Jasim, Zahraa Abbas Al-Khafaji, Suhas Ballal, Priya Priyadarshini Nayak, Renu Sharma, Kattela Chennakesavulu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Reena GuptaInstitute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, U. P, India. rspg80@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-8580
Haneen Fadhil JasimMedical Laboratory Techniques department, College of Health and medical technology, University of Al-maarif, Anbar, Iraq.
Zahraa Abbas Al-KhafajiCollege of pharmacy, the Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
Suhas BallalDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Priya Priyadarshini NayakDepartment of Medical Oncology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, 751003, Odisha, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8421-3630
Renu SharmaDepartment of Chemistry, University Institute of Sciences, Chandigarh University, Mohali, 140413, India.
Kattela ChennakesavuluDepartment of CHEMISTRY, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3415-1865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer continues to be one of the top killers worldwide. Traditional treatment strategies like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery have non-specific treatment options with considerable side effects. Gene-based therapies using nucleic acids like siRNA, miRNA, and DNAzymes provide an alternative approach; however, issues with stability, delivery, and off-target effects continue to plague their clinical use. Niosomes, or non-ionic surfactant vesicles, provide a flexible and inexpensive alternative to circumvent many of these issues. This review will present the niosomal systems for nucleic acid delivery in cancer therapy. Niosomes have key advantages compared to traditional delivery vehicles due to their chemical stability and biocompatibility, and ease of surface modifications. Their ability to carry a range of nucleic acids and allow for endosomal escape makes niosomes ideal candidates for targeted, multimodal therapies. Critical therapeutic applications include co-delivery of nucleic acids with chemotherapeutic drugs to improve synergistic activity, reprogramming the tumor microenvironment to increase immune response, and bypassing mechanisms of tumor resistance. In addition, the incorporation of external triggers, such as magnetic and ultrasound responsive elements, provides precise spatiotemporal control over nucleic acid release. The review outlines exciting research improvements of niosomal formulations based on surface charge, ligand targeting, and new genetic payloads, underscoring the state-of-the-art potential of niosomes for personalized cancer treatments. niosomes showed low immunogenicity and good pharmacokinetics in preclinical research, suggesting they are highly translational and leading-edge for next-generation cancer treatments.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsLiposomesNeoplasmsNucleic AcidsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHumansRNA, Small InterferingAntineoplastic AgentsLiposomesNucleic AcidsRNA, Small InterferingCancer therapyGene delivery systemsNiosomesNucleic acid deliveryTargeted drug delivery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.