Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642368›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biometeorology2026

Revisiting therapeutic landscapes in the spa context: toward a multisensory, evidence-based framework for healing environments.

Jana Walterová, Tomáš Vylita, Alina Huseynli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biometeorology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jana WalterováInstitute of Spa and Balneology, Závodní 353/88, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic. walterova@i-lab.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6025-2759
Tomáš VylitaInstitute of Spa and Balneology, Závodní 353/88, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5192-589X
Alina HuseynliInstitute of Spa and Balneology, Závodní 353/88, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7666-5629

Funding

European Just Transition Fund CZ.10.01.01/00/22 001/0000261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic potential of spa landscapes represents an emerging intersection between environmental psychology, medical geology, health geography, and wellness tourism research. This narrative review synthesizes existing empirical findings and theoretical frameworks to examine how spa environments contribute to human health and well-being outcomes. Historically, European spa towns exemplify therapeutic landscapes, rooted in the use of natural healing resources such as mineral waters, gases, peloids, and climate. These environments are shaped not only by their physical resources but also by multisensory qualities, spatial aesthetics, and cultural traditions, which together create complex therapeutic settings. Drawing from landscape architecture, environmental psychology, therapeutic horticulture, and medical geography, this review explores the mechanisms through which natural and designed spa landscapes facilitate healing processes. Evidence suggests that benefits arise from interactions between environmental quality, embodied experiences, and social and cultural factors. Yet scientific understanding remains fragmented, and no unified typology of spa environments, whether medical or wellness-oriented, or across various global contexts, currently exists. This review highlights the need for interdisciplinary empirical studies and proposes a conceptual basis for future research bridging environmental science, health geography, and wellness studies.

Indexed as

BalneologyEnvironmentHumansBalneologyNatural healing sourcesSpaTherapeutic landscapesWell-being

Identifiers

PMID41642368
PMCPMC12876110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.