Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642339›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026

Evaluating Global Online Search Trends for Urinary Incontinence Treatment Modalities: Insights from Google Trends.

Hakan Akdere, Atınç Tozsin, Burak Akgül, Muhidin Hassan İbrahim, Selçuk Güven, Kamran Ahmed

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hakan AkdereUrology Department, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Atınç TozsinŞırnak Silopi State Hospital, Şırnak, Turkey.
Burak AkgülUrology Department, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Muhidin Hassan İbrahimUrology Department, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Selçuk GüvenUrology Department, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey. selcukguven@hotmail.com.
Kamran AhmedSheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThis study is aimed at analyzing global public interest in treatment modalities for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) from 2004 to 2025 using Google Trends, a digital tool that captures real-time search behavior.

methodsGoogle Trends data were collected for eight urinary incontinence treatment modalities, including both conservative and surgical options, over a 21-year period. The search terms analyzed were: "pelvic floor exercise" (PFE), "artificial urinary sphincter" (AUS), "transobturator tape", "Burch colposuspension," "midurethral sling" (MUS), "Bulkamid", "tension-free vaginal tape", and "pubovaginal sling" (PVS). Linear regression was used to evaluate the direction and magnitude of trend changes, and Pearson correlation analysis assessed inter-relationships among modalities. Data were retrieved on 2 April 2025, and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics.

resultsPelvic floor exercise demonstrated the strongest and most consistent upward trend among all modalities (R

conclusionsPublic interest is shifting toward conservative management, especially PFE, whereas interest in certain surgical techniques is declining. These findings highlight evolving treatment preferences and the need for region-specific health strategies. Despite its limitations, Google Trends can help to monitor awareness and inform future public health efforts.

Indexed as

InternetSearch EngineUrinary Incontinence, StressExercise TherapyFemaleHumansSuburethral SlingsUrinary Sphincter, ArtificialGoogle trendsPelvic floor exercisePublic interestUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.