Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41642042›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Predicting what and when across saccades: Evidence from the extrafoveal preview effect.

David Melcher, Michele Deodato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David MelcherPsychology Program, Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Michele DeodatoPsychology Program, Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to fully process items of interest, we use information from outside the fovea to plan the target of the next saccadic eye movement. There is growing evidence that our initial preview of the identity and features of the saccade target, prior to bringing it to the fovea using the saccade, is used to make our subsequent post-saccadic processing more efficient. However, the mechanisms underlying trans-saccadic previews remain unknown. We investigated this in a gaze-contingent preview paradigm in which a face stimulus either remained the same ("valid preview") or changed ("invalid preview") during the saccadic eye movement. On some trials, a brief blank gap was added at the beginning of the new fixation, before the face was presented at the fovea. Although the expected preview benefit was found when the face stimulus was present after the saccade, the addition of the blank period eliminated the preview effect. Our results suggest that the preview effect relies on a sensorimotor prediction about both "what" will be present at the fovea after the saccade and "when" the new fixation will begin. These findings provided further evidence for an active, predictive mechanism for trans-saccadic perception.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularFovea CentralisSaccadesAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41642042
PMCPMC12889167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.