ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2026
Patient-prosthesis mismatch after aortic valve replacement: Effects on left ventricular structure.
Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re: Trans-catheter versus open surgical aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) on left ventricular structure and functional capacity in patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) for severe aortic stenosis. Methods: This retrospective analysis included preoperative and postoperative data of 157 consecutive patients who underwent isolated sAVR between January 2016 and January 2023. Body mass index and indexed effective orifice area were calculated. The severity of PPM was assessed using the valve academic research consortium-3 criteria, and patients were categorized into (1) Insignificant PPM and (2) Significant PPM. Left ventricular geometries were classified based on the left ventricular mass index (LVMi) and relative wall thickness. Functional capacity was evaluated according to the New York Heart Association classification. Results: The mean age of the 91 patients who met the selection criteria was 64.2±8.9 years, and 44% were female and 56% were male. Sixteen patients (17.6%) were assigned to the significant PPM group. The median change in LVMi was -33 g/m Conclusion: Avoiding significant PPM provides better regression in LVMi and greater improvement in functional capacity; however, it is not sufficient for a significant change in left ventricular geometr y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.