Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641891›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Toward a Consensus Characterization Protocol for Organic Thermoelectrics.

Bernhard Dörling, Ian E Jacobs, Irene Brunetti, Nathan James Pataki, Shannon K Yee, Dorothea Scheunemann, Keehoon Kang, Guangzheng Zuo, Juan Sebastián Reparaz, Takao Mori and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Bernhard DörlingInstitut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona, ICMAB-CSIC, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3171-0526
Ian E JacobsOptoelectronics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1535-4608
Irene BrunettiInstitute for Molecular Systems Engineering and Advanced Materials, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7028-9829
Nathan James PatakiCenter for Nano Science and Technology, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3691-5427
Shannon K YeeGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1119-9938
Dorothea ScheunemannInstitute for Molecular Systems Engineering and Advanced Materials, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9458-7022
Keehoon KangMaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-3626
Guangzheng ZuoInstitute for Electric Light Sources, College of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7883-8215
Juan Sebastián ReparazInstitut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona, ICMAB-CSIC, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9679-0075
Takao MoriResearch Center For Materials Nanoarchitectonics, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-1846
Michael L ChabinycMaterials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4641-3508
Christian MüllerDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7859-7909
Mario CaironiCenter for Nano Science and Technology, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0442-4439
Martijn KemerinkInstitute for Molecular Systems Engineering and Advanced Materials, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7104-7127
Mariano Campoy-QuilesInstitut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona, ICMAB-CSIC, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8911-640X

Funding

Division of Materials Research 2310935H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 955837HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 101226517Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse 2022.0034Ministerio de Ciencia e InnovaciónMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501-100011033/ through Severo Ochoa program CEX2023-001263-SNational Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00436867Royal Society URF/R1/231287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the field of organic thermoelectrics advances toward maturity, an accurate and standardized reporting of performance metrics becomes essential to drive further progress and assess real-world viability. The common geometric form factors and material properties (conductivity, anisotropy, stability, etc.) differ from those of conventional bulk inorganic systems, and thus specific recommendations may apply. Herein, we compile prevalent points of concern in the reporting of thermoelectric performance for organic materials and devices. Moreover, we propose a list of critical factors and metrics that should be explicitly documented when reporting the performance of novel organic thermoelectric materials or devices.

Indexed as

best practicesorganic thermoelectricsSeebeck coefficientthermal conductivitythermoelectric characterizationthermoelectric generators

Identifiers

PMID41641891
PMCPMC12966978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.