Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641889›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2024

A demographic assessment of the Lansing Effect in duckweed (Lemna turionifera Landolt).

Priyanka Dutt, Robert A Laird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Priyanka DuttDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada.
Robert A LairdDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9913-0208

Funding

Alberta Conservation AssociationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Lansing Effect is the propensity for offspring of older parents to have shorter lifespans than offspring of younger parents. A recent review identified two demographic patterns that can produce the Lansing Effect: (i) a greater offspring mortality rate at all offspring ages in offspring of older versus younger parents (greater initial mortality parameter); and (ii) an offspring mortality rate that increases more rapidly with offspring age in offspring of older versus younger parents (greater mortality rate parameter). Here, we report on a longitudinal study designed to investigate these patterns, using the duckweed Lemna turionifera. We tracked asexually produced offspring that detached from parents that were comparatively young versus old (first versus fifth offspring, respectively). Offspring of older parents lived 15% shorter, on average, than offspring of younger parents, providing evidence of the Lansing Effect. A model-selection approach revealed that the difference between survival curves of first versus fifth offspring was mainly attributable to greater initial mortality in fifth compared to first offspring, though alternative models also received some support. Our study provides a demographic explanation for the Lansing Effect in L. turionifera in particular and provides a method for assessing the survival patterns underpinning the Lansing Effect in general.

Indexed as

aquatic plantsdemographyLansing EffectLemnoideaelifespan

Identifiers

PMID41641889
PMCPMC11479754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.