Trial reportClinical and translational science2026
Effects of Siltuximab Versus Corticosteroids in Preventing COVID-19 Pneumonia Disease Progression: Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Siltuximab Versus Corticosteroids in Preventing COVID-19 Pneumonia Disease Progression: Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.Clinical and translational science · 2026Trial
- 'Cells · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2020, COVID-19 caused a global health crisis, prompting research efforts and accelerating drug development. As part of this response, we conducted a phase 2b, multicentre, open-label, randomized (1:1) clinical trial to compare the effects of siltuximab versus corticosteroids on disease progression in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 pneumonia. Between April 2020 and January 2021, 82 patients were randomized to receive siltuximab and 80 corticosteroids (20 methylprednisolone and 60 dexamethasone). Median (IQR) age was 61 years (50-72). Nineteen patients allocated to siltuximab were admitted to the intensive care unit compared to eight receiving corticosteroids (p = 0.025). Corticosteroid treatment was independently associated with a higher risk of avoiding intensive care unit admission (2.7; 95% CI, 1.11-6.62), lower risk of requiring mechanical ventilation (0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.93) and shorter hospitalization duration (p = 0.008). Mortality was similar between arms (p = 0.675). Twenty-eight patients receiving siltuximab required rescue therapy while only 5 receiving corticosteroids (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients receiving corticosteroids had a 53% lower risk of confirmed bacterial or fungal invasive infections (RR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.95; p = 0.0096). Our results show that initial treatment with corticosteroids was more effective than siltuximab in preventing disease progression, reducing intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, with shorter hospital stays, and fewer infection in COVID-19 pneumonia. Despite numerous challenges, these findings provide valuable insights into optimizing therapeutic strategies, supporting corticosteroids as a preferred treatment over siltuximab in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.