ReviewStem cells translational medicine2026
Cell therapy for stroke and spinal cord injury in clinical trials.
Review in Stem cells translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stem Cells in Post-Stroke Regenerative Therapy: Current Role of Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Orchestrum.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Unapproved regenerative medicine for spinal cord injury in Japan.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain injury describes a variety of injuries to the tissues and blood vessels in the head. It can be external such as in road accident or physical assaults or internal such as a stroke. Regardless, they are largely incurable with a long route to recovery with symptoms-relieving medications and rehabilitation. As such, many therapies were explored including cell therapy. However, not all were evidence based and in many instances banking of patients' desperation, many treatments were done without any evidence from clinical trials. Here, we reviewed clinical trials on clinicaltrials.gov for stroke and spinal cord injury where there are cellular therapies transplanting neural, mesenchymal, and haemopoietic cells. We present and discuss 40 trials involving cell therapies for stroke and 32 for spinal cord injuries that are either completed or active. Although some trials began as long as 20 years ago and have shown encouraging improvements in various scale scores for both stroke and spinal cord injury, cell transplantation for brain injuries remains an evolving field that requires further research before it can be established as a standard treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.