ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Cytoplasmic poly-adenosine binding proteins modulate susceptibility of mRNAs to Pumilio-mediated decay.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PABPC1 in Cancer: From a Translational Housekeeper to a Stress-Responsive Regulatory Hub.Cancer science · 2026Review
- The molecular determinants of PABPC-mediated deadenylation rate.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cytoplasmic fate of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) is dictated by the balance of translation and mRNA degradation, governed in part by the 3' poly-adenosine tail and cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding proteins (PABPCs). Deadenylases remove poly(A) to initiate mRNA decay, while sequence-specific RNA-binding factors, including Pumilio proteins (PUM1 and PUM2), modulate these processes. We investigated how human PUM1&2 repress target mRNAs by accelerating their degradation. We found that the poly(A) tail plays a central role in PUM repression, dependent on the interplay of deadenylases and PABPCs. PUM-mediated repression requires the CCR4-NOT deadenylase but not the poly(A) nuclease. PUMs associate with and require PABPC1 and PABPC4 to repress. In the absence of PABPCs, both PUM targets and non-targets become unstable, bypassing PUM control. Increasing PABPC inhibits PUM activity in a concentration-dependent manner by stabilizing poly(A) mRNAs. The results support a Goldilocks principle, wherein PABPC abundance tunes the response of mRNAs to PUM-mediated repression through protection of poly(A) from deadenylation. We propose that this principle may apply to other poly(A) dependent regulatory factors. Variation of PABPC levels across tissues and development suggests physiological relevance for this mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.