Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641648›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2026

A Clinical Guidance for the Management of Patients With Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma and A Case Series.

Christina Liava, Sudhakar Venkatesh, Michael S Torbenson, Patrick S Kamath, Moira Hilscher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina LiavaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9523-5694
Sudhakar VenkateshRadiology Department, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Michael S TorbensonDivision of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Patrick S KamathDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Moira HilscherDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) is a rare extrahepatic tumor of non-germ cell origin that morphologically resembles hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HAC has a propensity to metastasize to the liver and therefore may be mistaken for HCC. There is a lack of standardized treatment protocols, and further studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Recent studies have reported that tumor protein 53 (TP53) gene mutations are associated with increased expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), which may be a predictor of response to PD-L1 targeted checkpoint inhibitors. This review provides a clinical guidance for the management of patients with HAC by summarizing the salient clinical features, risk factors, diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, new therapeutic approaches, and prognosis of this rare tumor. Furthermore, we reviewed the Mayo Clinic experience to describe the clinical characteristics of 15 patients diagnosed with HAC. HAC is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage with distant metastases. In patients diagnosed with liver lesions that have similar radiologic and histologic features to HCC, particularly in the absence of underlying chronic liver disease, further evaluation should be performed to rule out HAC. Communication between medical subspecialties is important to avoid misdiagnosis and prevent further disease progression. In our patient cohort TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene (5 out of 8, 62.5%) and PD-L1 expression showed a positive score in 3 out of 6 patients (50%). However, only a few patients received immunotherapy (6 out of 14, 42.9%) suggesting that the numbers are too small to draw a conclusion about its efficacy in treating HAC.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaLiver NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumorcase seriesclinical guidancehepatoid adenocarcinomamolecular biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41641648
PMCPMC12873860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.