ArticleThe New phytologist2026
When wuthering winds create fluttering fields: structural and biomechanical properties determine canopy light fluctuation properties of 10 wheat cultivars.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low wind, high impact: sustained low airflow alters water use efficiency and shapes plant acclimation.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wind-driven plant movement generates rapid light fluctuations (windflecks), which can impact canopy photosynthesis. Targeting crop photosynthesis in dynamic light provides a potential path towards boosting yield. Here, we quantified how plant architecture and biomechanics modulate such windflecks across 10 high-yielding cultivars of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Using synchronized high-frequency measurements of irradiance, wind speed, and canopy motion (quantified by frame differencing from video), we assessed the propensity of wheat cultivars to move (motion sensitivity), and the ability for movement to produce windflecks (light modulation efficiency) in the field. There was up to 10-fold variation in the quantity of motion between cultivars under identical wind speeds. Cultivars also exhibited structural trade-offs and specific in canopy windfleck properties. Some had low motion under wind but produced frequent windflecks when moving, whereas others exhibited high motion under similar wind but varied in windfleck frequency. Overall, windfleck properties were best explained by aerodynamic traits: cultivars with narrower leaves and lower leaf-to-stem mass ratios were associated with more intense windflecks. These findings establish that wheat cultivars actively modulate their light environment through biomechanical traits. By integrating plant motion into crop models, favouring motion-light relationships, which could provide a critical route to yield improvements in turbulent environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.