Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641506›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Marginally Interpretable Spatial Logistic Regression With Bridge Processes.

Changwoo J Lee, David B Dunson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Changwoo J LeeDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
David B DunsonDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Improving inferences on health effects of chemical exposuresR01ES035625 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI David Brian Dunson · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
H2020 European Research Council 856506National Science Foundation IIS-2426762NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES035625NIH HHS R01ES035625Office of Naval Research N00014-21-1-2510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In including random effects to account for dependent observations, the odds ratio interpretation of logistic regression coefficients is changed from population-averaged to subject-specific. This is unappealing in many applications, motivating a rich literature on methods that maintain the marginal logistic regression structure without random effects, such as generalized estimating equations. However, for spatial data, random effect approaches are appealing in providing a full probabilistic characterization of the data that can be used for prediction. We propose a new class of spatial logistic regression models that maintain both population-averaged and subject-specific interpretations through a novel class of bridge processes for spatial random effects. These processes are shown to have appealing computational and theoretical properties, including a scale mixture of normal representation. The new methodology is illustrated with simulations and an analysis of childhood malaria prevalence data in Gambia.

Indexed as

Logistic ModelsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalGambiaHumansMalariaModels, StatisticalOdds RatioPrevalenceBayesianelliptical processmarginal modelmodel‐based geostatisticsrandom effectsspatial binary data

Identifiers

PMID41641506
PMCPMC12991412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.