ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
In sync through laughter? An fNIRS hyperscanning study on neural synchrony and social connection.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laughter in the making: social bonding and coordination in dance practices.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laughter is a widespread social behavior that has been associated with increases in social connection. However, the mechanisms behind this link are not yet well understood. We hypothesized that laughter supports positive social outcomes by enhancing neural synchrony during social interactions. Neural synchrony is a process of mutual alignment of brain areas, which has been shown to positively affect social interactions. In a 2 × 2 design, participant pairs watched either funny or neutral videos (Laughter Manipulation: yes/no), either together or separately (Social Context: yes/no). Afterwards, they engaged in a 10-minute free interaction. Laughter behavior was annotated during both phases. Neural synchrony was measured using fNIRS hyperscanning for both phases and quantified across frontal and temporal regions using Wavelet Transform Coherence. As social outcomes, we measured Liking, Prosociality, and Bonding after the free conversation. We tested our hypotheses with Bayesian models that assessed the effects of Laughter and Social context on social outcomes, with synchrony modeled as a mediator. Parameter estimates for the effects of Laughter and Social Context on interpersonal neural synchrony were close to zero, with Bayes Factors indicating evidence for the null hypothesis. Similarly, the effects of Laughter and Social Context on Liking, Prosociality, and Bonding showed no effects. However, model comparisons provided evidence for annotated Laughter Behavior as a predictor of Liking, Prosociality, and Bonding. Mediation analyses revealed no overall effect, but some findings stood out. We observed a negative association between right IFG and right TPJ synchrony during the manipulation phase and later Liking, and a positive association between right and left IFG synchrony and subsequent Prosociality. Additionally, synchrony during the free interaction phase between the left IFG and right TPJ predicted Liking and synchrony between the left and right TPJ predicted Bonding. In total, our findings show no direct link between Laughter and neural synchrony. However, Laughter Behavior was associated with social outcomes. Additionally, neural synchrony was also linked to social outcomes, with distinct positive and negative associations depending on the brain regions involved. These results highlight the complexity of the relationship between laughter, neural synchrony, and social connection, suggesting the need for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.