ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Controlled venospasm-assisted foam sclerotherapy combined with high ligation-a novel minimally invasive approach for primary great saphenous vein varicosities.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Controlled Venospasm-Assisted Foam Sclerotherapy (CVAFS) combined with high ligation (HL) for treating primary great saphenous vein (GSV) varicosities. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort of 127 patients with primary GSV varicosities underwent CVAFS with high ligation between 1 Jan 2023 and 1 October 2023. Venospasm was induced by rotational mechanical stimulation of the catheter combined with external compression, resulting in a transient reduction of vessel diameter by 50%-70%, followed by DSA (Digital subtraction angiography)-guided foam injection (1:4 liquid-to-gas ratio). Technical success was defined as complete procedural execution under imaging guidance. Primary endpoints included 1-year GSV occlusion rate (assessed by duplex ultrasound) and reduction in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Complications were recorded and managed conservatively. Results: Technical success was achieved in 100% of limbs (145/145). Among 127 enrolled patients, 109 patients (125 limbs) completed the 12-month follow-up, yielding a follow-up rate of 85.8% (109/127). At 12 months, 93.6% of great saphenous veins (117/125 limbs) maintained complete occlusion. The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) significantly decreased from 6.18 ± 3.90 preoperatively to 0.86 ± 0.90 postoperatively ( Conclusion: CVAFS leverages controlled venospasm to enhance foam-endothelium contact, significantly improving occlusion rates and symptom relief with acceptable safety. This approach offers a promising minimally invasive alternative for GSV varicosities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.