ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Case Report: Application of the LVIS stent as a bridging device for salvage treatment of malapposed lattice flow diverter in a giant posterior circulation aneurysm: technical note and clinical efficacy.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent pressure-controlled ureteral access sheath: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, technical nuances, and clinical outcomes of using the LVIS stent as a bridging device for the salvage treatment of a malapposed Lattice flow diverter (FD) in a giant posterior circulation aneurysm. Methods: We present a detailed case report of a patient with a giant aneurysm in the V4 segment of the vertebral artery. Following implantation of a Lattice blood flow diverter and coils, immediate post-procedural angiography revealed incomplete opening and malapposition at the proximal segment of the stent, accompanied by delayed distal flow. After unsuccessful attempts to improve wall apposition via microcatheter massage, a salvage strategy was employed by deploying an LVIS stent within the malapposed FD segment. This approach aimed to enhance overall wall apposition and metal coverage to achieve ultimate aneurysm occlusion. Results: The salvage procedure was performed successfully. The LVIS stent was accurately deployed within the malapposed segment of the FD. Angiographic assessment after the procedure demonstrated complete wall apposition of the composite stent construct and total occlusion of the aneurysm sac. The patient experienced no new neurological deficits during the perioperative period. Short-term follow-up indicated an excellent clinical outcome, with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0. Conclusion: Utilizing the LVIS stent as a bridging salvage strategy is a safe and effective technical option for managing malapposed FDs in complex giant posterior circulation aneurysms. This technique effectively enhances stent wall apposition and structural integrity, potentially promoting intra-aneurysmal thrombosis and eventual occlusion. It provides a valuable clinical approach for managing this challenging complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.