ReviewCurrent addiction reports2026
Recent Advances in the Science of Cannabis-Impaired Driving.
Review in Current addiction reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: To examine cannabis-induced effects on driving performance. Prior systematic reviews consistently reveal that Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) impairs driving performance. The present narrative review summarized evidence on the acute and residual effects of cannabis on driving performance from controlled experimental research completed in the past five years. Expanding on prior research, recent studies examine individual and combined effects of THC and cannabidiol (CBD), combined effects of cannabis and alcohol, and a variety of cannabis administration modes. Recent Findings: Cannabis with THC acutely impairs driving without significant residual deficits. CBD does not acutely impair driving performance, although relatively low doses (< 300 mg) were used in most studies. The combination of alcohol and THC results in additive effects that amplifies impairment. In line with prior research findings, cannabis-induced driving impairment is consistently observed within the first hour after use and impairment remains detectable for ~ 4-5 h post-inhalation; studies testing oral and sublingual cannabis administrations were sparse. Participants were willing and ready to drive shortly after using cannabis while their driving skills were objectively impaired. Summary: Despite clear evidence of cannabis-induced driving impairment, a consistent impairment standard that can be used outside the laboratory is lacking. More research focused on sensitive biomarkers combined with technologically-advanced behavioral methods is needed to improve the precision and accuracy in determining cannabis-induced driving impairment. Future studies should focus on novel oral and oromucosal formulations emerging on the legal cannabis market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.