Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641433›Full record

ReviewCurrent addiction reports2026

Recent Advances in the Science of Cannabis-Impaired Driving.

Jane Metrik, Nicholas Bush, Rachel L Gunn, Denis M McCarthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current addiction reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jane MetrikCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Box G-S121-4, Providence, RI 02903 USA.
Nicholas BushCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Box G-S121-4, Providence, RI 02903 USA.
Rachel L GunnCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Box G-S121-4, Providence, RI 02903 USA.
Denis M McCarthyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201 USA.

Funding

Individual, contextual, and geospatial influences on decisions to drive under the influence of cannabisR01DA055654 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI JANE METRIK · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA055654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: To examine cannabis-induced effects on driving performance. Prior systematic reviews consistently reveal that Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) impairs driving performance. The present narrative review summarized evidence on the acute and residual effects of cannabis on driving performance from controlled experimental research completed in the past five years. Expanding on prior research, recent studies examine individual and combined effects of THC and cannabidiol (CBD), combined effects of cannabis and alcohol, and a variety of cannabis administration modes. Recent Findings: Cannabis with THC acutely impairs driving without significant residual deficits. CBD does not acutely impair driving performance, although relatively low doses (< 300 mg) were used in most studies. The combination of alcohol and THC results in additive effects that amplifies impairment. In line with prior research findings, cannabis-induced driving impairment is consistently observed within the first hour after use and impairment remains detectable for ~ 4-5 h post-inhalation; studies testing oral and sublingual cannabis administrations were sparse. Participants were willing and ready to drive shortly after using cannabis while their driving skills were objectively impaired. Summary: Despite clear evidence of cannabis-induced driving impairment, a consistent impairment standard that can be used outside the laboratory is lacking. More research focused on sensitive biomarkers combined with technologically-advanced behavioral methods is needed to improve the precision and accuracy in determining cannabis-induced driving impairment. Future studies should focus on novel oral and oromucosal formulations emerging on the legal cannabis market.

Indexed as

CannabisDrivingDriving under the influenceImpairmentTetrahydrocannabinol

Identifiers

PMID41641433
PMCPMC12864297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.