Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641421›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2026

Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Circumferential Resection Margin Predicts Long-term Survival in Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.

Ambarish Chatterjee, Mufaddal Kazi, Mihir Chandarana, Ramkishan Nag, Suman Kumar Ankathi, Akshay Baheti, Vivek Sukumar, Ashwin Desouza, Avanish Saklani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ambarish ChatterjeeUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Mufaddal KaziUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Mihir ChandaranaUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Ramkishan NagUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Suman Kumar AnkathiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Akshay BahetiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Vivek SukumarUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Ashwin DesouzaUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Avanish SaklaniUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012 India.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-7612

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In rectal adenocarcinoma, the diagnostic accuracy of baseline MRI for predicting circumferential resection margin (CRM) is established. However, data regarding the role of baseline and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACTRT) MRI-mesorectal fascia (MRI-MRF)-positive status in predicting long-term oncological outcomes is relatively scarce and heterogeneous. The objective of the study is to evaluate the long-term oncological survival outcomes of baseline and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACTRT) MRI-MRF as predictors of long-term survival outcomes, i.e., overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Single center retrospective analysis from a prospectively maintained database. Patients undergoing curative surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma either upfront or post-NACTRT between July 2013 and April 2014. Patients with cT3/cT4 or N + received NACTRT before surgery. The pre-NACTRT MRI was recorded as MRI 1-MRF and post-NACTRT MRI was recorded as MRI 2-MRF. MRI scans done at presentation irrespective of further treatment were labeled as MRI T-MRF. Out of 254 patients, 217 were eligible for analysis. The median follow-up duration is 132 months. Seventy-six percent of patients received NACTRT. Overall, recurrences were seen in 68/217 (31.3%) patients, with 18 local and 50 distant recurrences. Eighty-six (39.6%) deaths were recorded, most due to disease progression. The 5-year OS of the cohort was 69.1% (95% C.I 63-75.8); 5-year DFS was 67.4% (95% C.I 61.2-74.3); and the 5-year LRFS was 91% (95% C.I 87-95.2). MRI T-MRF status was significantly associated in predicting OS, DFS, and LRFS. MRI 1-MRF status is a strong predictor for OS and DFS. The MRI 2-MRF status is a weak predictor for OS and is not associated with DFS and LRFS. The path-CRM-positive status is a significant predictor of OS and DFS, however not for LRFS. Baseline MRI-MRF status is a robust and strong predictor of long-term survival outcomes (OS, DFS, LRFS). Patients with baseline MRI-CRM-positive status have poorer outcomes irrespective of neoadjuvant therapy and poor histology features.

Indexed as

Circumferential resection marginMesorectal fasciaMRI in rectal cancerRectal cancer surgerySurvival in rectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID41641421
PMCPMC12864624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.