Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641411›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2026

Clinical Implications of Cytology Negative Pleural Effusion in Advanced Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer-Insights from a Tertiary Cancer Center in Northeast India.

Debabrata Barmon, Mahendra Kumar, Karthik Chandra Bassetty, Upasana Baruah, Dimpy Begum, Mouchumee Bhattacharyya, P S Roy, Shiraj Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Debabrata BarmonDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam 781016 India.
Mahendra KumarDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam 781016 India.ORCID 0000-0002-1804-8585
Karthik Chandra BassettyDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam 781016 India.
Upasana BaruahDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam 781016 India.
Dimpy BegumDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam 781016 India.
Mouchumee BhattacharyyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam 781016 India.
P S RoyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, , Assam 781016 India.
Shiraj AhmedDepartment of Oncopathology, Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, , Assam 781016 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleural effusion is a decisive factor in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. The presence of malignant cells in pleural effusions in women with ovarian cancer is accepted as a poor prognostic factor. It is included in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVA. Still, the literature does not explain and prognoses the importance of cytology-negative pleural effusion (CNPE) in women with ovarian cancer. It is a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary cancer center. All advanced staged ovarian cancer patients with pleural effusion registered between January 2020 and December 2021 were included, and the control group consisted of all stage IIIC disease with no pleural effusion during the same duration. Survival analysis was done in these three groups-cytology-positive pleural effusion (CPPE), cytology-negative pleural effusion (CNPE), and no pleural effusion (NPE). In total, 117 patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer, fulfilling the eligibility criteria, completed their treatment during the study period. Retrospective data was collected from hospital records, and survival analysis was done using SPSS 29.0. We included only those patients who had pleural fluid analyzed by a pathologist. During the study period, we found that 13 (11%) were CPPE, 23 (19.3%) were CNPE, and 81 (68%) were NPE. CNPE patients had poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to NPE patients, although both groups were labeled stage IIIC. These findings underscore the importance of cytology-negative pleural effusion in ovarian cancer prognosis, providing valuable insights for clinical practice. Patients with cytology-positive pleural effusion had the worst prognoses. However, CNPE patients labeled as stage IIIC had poor outcomes compared to NPE stage IIIC patients. So, based on our comprehensive study, we recommend a video thoracoscopic analysis of all patients with CNPE to correctly stage these patients, further modify their treatment accordingly, and improve their outcomes.

Indexed as

Advanced staged ovarian cancerCytology negative pleural effusionPleural effusionThoracoscopy in ovarian cancerVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41641411
PMCPMC12864551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.