ArticleBJUI compass2026
Safety and efficacy of Rezūm water vapour energy therapy in BPH patients receiving antithrombotic therapy: A Japanese single-centre experience.
Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and Efficacy of Rezūm Water Vapor Energy Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Continued Antithrombotic Therapy: A Comparative Study.Lower urinary tract symptoms · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of Rezūm water vapour energy therapy in BPH patients receiving antithrombotic therapy: A Japanese single-centre experience.BJUI compass · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Rezūm water vapour energy therapy (WAVE) in Japanese patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) continuing antithrombotic therapy and to validate the Okayama University Modified Clavien-Dindo classification (OU-mCD) for perioperative hematuria. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analysed 80 consecutive patients who underwent WAVE from August 2023 to July 2024, including 37 (46.2%) continuing antithrombotic therapy perioperatively. Hematuria within 30 days was graded using conventional Clavien-Dindo classification and the OU-mCD, a novel classification focusing on intervention necessity. We assessed clinically significant hematuria (Grade ≥ Ib), catheter-free rate, prostate volume reduction and haemoglobin change. Results: Clinically significant hematuria occurred in 21.6% (8/37) of patients continuing antithrombotic therapy versus 4.7% (2/43) without ( Conclusion: WAVE can be safely performed with continued antithrombotic therapy. Whereas Grade ≥Ib hematuria occurred in 25% of antiplatelet/anticoagulant users (vs. 5% without), 75% had no significant bleeding, and all complications were managed conservatively without transfusion. The OU-mCD provides precise complication stratification. These findings suggest outpatient procedures may be feasible with appropriate patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.