Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641321›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2025

Distinct spatial distribution of potentiated dendritic spines in encoding- and recall-activated hippocampal neurons.

Francesco Gobbo, Ajesh Jacob, Bruno Pinto, Marco Mainardi, Laura Cancedda, Antonino Cattaneo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco Gobbo *Bio@SNS, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.
Ajesh Jacob *Bio@SNS, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.
Bruno PintoBrain Development and Disease Laboratory, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Genova, Italy.
Marco MainardiBio@SNS, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.
Laura CanceddaBrain Development and Disease Laboratory, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Genova, Italy.
Antonino CattaneoBio@SNS, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental advancements in neuroscience have identified cellular engrams-ensembles of neurons whose activation is necessary and sufficient for memory retrieval. Synaptic plasticity, including long-term potentiation, is fundamental to memory encoding and recall, but the relationship between learning-induced dendritic spine potentiation and neuron-wide activation remains unclear. In this study, we employed a post-synaptic translation-dependent reporter consistent with potentiation (SA-PSDΔVenus) and a neuronal activation reporter (ESARE-dTurquoise) to determine their spatiotemporal correlation in the mouse hippocampal CA1 following contextual fear conditioning (CFC). SA-PSDΔVenus+ spines were enriched in ESARE-dTurquoise+ neurons, with distribution varying across CA1 layers at different phases of memory: SA-PSDΔVenus+ were more frequent in activated neurons in

Indexed as

dendritic engramdendritic spineengramfear conditioninghippocampuslong-term potentiationmemorysynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID41641321
PMCPMC12864489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.