ArticleComputing in cardiology2025
Predicting Ventricular Arrhythmia in Myocardial Ischemia Using Machine Learning.
Article in Computing in cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ventricular arrhythmia frequently complicates myocardial ischemic events, sometimes to devastating ends. Accurate arrhythmia prediction in this setting could improve outcomes, yet traditional models struggle with the temporal complexity of the data. This study employs a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to predict the time to the next premature ventricular contraction (PVC) using high-resolution experimental data. We analyzed electrograms from 11 large animal experiments, identifying 1832 PVCs, and computed time-to-PVC. An LSTM model (247 inputs, 1024 hidden units) was trained on 10 experiments, with one held out for testing, achieving a validation MAE of 8.6 seconds and a test MAE of 135 seconds (loss 68.5). Scatter plots showed strong validation correlation and a positive test trend, suggesting the potential of this approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.