ArticleCureus2026
Effectiveness and Safety of Fixed-Dose Empagliflozin/Linagliptin Combination in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Real-World Evidence From Bangladesh.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) presents a growing health burden globally and in Bangladesh, where control rates remain suboptimal. Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) integrating agents with complementary mechanisms, such as empagliflozin and linagliptin, may enhance glycemic control, reduce cardiovascular risk factors, and improve adherence. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin-linagliptin FDC over 24 weeks in adult T2DM patients in Bangladesh.
methodsThis prospective, multi-center, open-label, real-world observational cohort study was conducted across 10 outpatient centers in routine clinical practice in Bangladesh and enrolled 321 adults with T2DM who were either treatment-naïve or inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs. Participants received once daily empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg, plus linagliptin 5 mg. Clinical visits were conducted at baseline, week 6, week 12, and week 24. Primary endpoints comprised changes in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Secondary measures included proportions achieving HbA1c <7%, and changes in weight, blood pressure, lipid profile, renal function, and liver enzymes. Safety was assessed via recorded adverse events and treatment discontinuation rates.
resultsAt 24 weeks, mean HbA1c decreased significantly from 9.82 ± 1.01% to 6.29 ± 0.76% (mean change: -3.55%, n = 303, p<0.001). FPG dropped from 13.27 ± 2.66 mmol/L to 6.31 ± 0.70 mmol/L (mean change: -6.96 mmol/L, n = 321, p < 0.001), and 225 (74.3%) attained HbA1c <7%. There were significant reductions in mean weight (-7.17 kg), systolic blood pressure (-14.97 mmHg), and diastolic blood pressure (-2.84 mmHg) (n = 321, p < 0.001 for all). Among subsets, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides, serum creatinine, and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) levels improved, with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increasing significantly (p < 0.05). No serious adverse events or study withdrawals occurred; minor adverse events (AEs) included transient hypoglycemia in one participant (<1%), anorexia or nausea in 10 (≤3.1%), urinary tract infections in two (~0.6%), dysuria in two (<1%), and dizziness in two (<1%).
conclusionIn this real-world observational cohort of Bangladeshi adults with T2DM, treatment with the empagliflozin-linagliptin FDC was associated with improvements in glycemic control, cardiometabolic benefits, and renal improvements over 24 weeks, with a favorable short-term safety profile. These findings indicate that the FDC was associated with significant improvements in this real-world cohort, providing supportive evidence for its utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.